Association of the Charlson index with risk classification, clinical aspects, and emergency outcomes*

11Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To exam the association of the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index with the categories of risk classification, the clinical aspects, and the patient outcomes in the emergency department. Method: Cross-sectional, analytical study that analyzed the medical records of 3,624 patients seen in the emergency department. Charlson index scores greater than 2 showed a high rate of comorbidity (mortality risk). T-test and analysis of variance were applied in the analyses. Results: There was a significant difference between the Charlson comorbidity index and the risk classification, with higher scores found in patients classified in the white (2.57) and red (2.06) categories. Patients with vascular, endocrine, neurological, cardiologic, or device problems, and those who underwent a head tomography had a high rate of comorbidity. In addition, those admitted, transferred, or who died in the emergency room had significantly higher index scores compared to those who were discharged from the hospital. Conclusion: The high rate of comorbidity was associated with the categories of risk classification, main and nonspecific complaints, performance of a head tomography, and patient outcomes in the emergency room.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Jesus, A. P. S., Okuno, M. F. P., Campanharo, C. R. V., Lopes, M. C. B. T., & Batista, R. E. A. (2022). Association of the Charlson index with risk classification, clinical aspects, and emergency outcomes*. Revista Da Escola de Enfermagem, 56. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2020-0162

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free