A comparative investigation between rule- and inverse model-based fault detection and diagnostics for HVAC control systems

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2600/2/022007 Fault detection and diagnostics (FDD) tools provide valuable information regarding system faults and deviation from expected operation. Most existing FDD tools apply rule-based fault detection algorithms that generate an alarm when a rule is met; however, these tools cannot evaluate the overall performance of a system. Inverse-model-based FDD algorithms can be deployed to complement the fault alarms triggered by rule-based building energy management systems (BEMS). This paper examines the faults detected by rule- and inverse model-based algorithms used to detect faults in multiple zone variable air volume air handling unit systems. The capability of the rule- and inverse model-based algorithms in detecting and diagnosing faults is demonstrated through illustrative examples using data from three commercial buildings in New Brunswick, Canada. The results show that inverse model-based algorithms could diagnose faults that were not detected by the rule-based FDD algorithms implemented in a commercially available BEMS tool.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Darwazeh, D., Gunay, B., Rizvi, F., Lowcay, D., & Shillinglaw, S. (2023). A comparative investigation between rule- and inverse model-based fault detection and diagnostics for HVAC control systems. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2600). Institute of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2600/2/022007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free