The ball vanishes in the air: can we blame representational momentum?

9Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the vanishing ball illusion (VBI), the magician throws a ball up into the air twice and then pretends to do a third throw. On the third (fake) throw, the audience sees the ball go up and then disappear. In this article, we study the psychological mechanisms at play in this magic trick. We test the hypothesis that the illusion is based on representational momentum (RM), a psychological phenomenon in which the observer perceives the stopping point of a moving scene as being located farther ahead in the direction of motion than it really is. To determine whether the mechanisms involved in VBI are similar to those underlying RM, we compared the results of a standard VBI task to those obtained on an RM task designed to be very close to the VBI task. The results showed that VBI sensitivity was not associated with a higher anticipation score on the RM task. Unexpectedly, we found that participants who were sensitive to the illusion even obtained a weaker RM effect. We discuss several hypotheses that might account for these results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thomas, C., & Didierjean, A. (2016). The ball vanishes in the air: can we blame representational momentum? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(6), 1810–1817. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1037-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free