Why parité is a better goal than quotas

8Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Quotas, parité, and proportional representation have been the main strategies for redressing injustice in political representation, as well as for amending women ' s under-representation. These strategies are an explicit recognition that representation is both a democratic value and a form of participation. The search for strategies of redress is undoubtedly an important fact that testifi es to a change in women ' s attitude toward representative politics as no longer a target of mistrust in the name of direct participation. This article advocates making parité the general criterion for justice in representation as the best rendering of the peculiarity of women in political representation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Urbinati, N. (2012). Why parité is a better goal than quotas. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 10(2), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor063

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free