The sword and the scales: The United States and international courts and tribunals

17Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Sword and the Scales is the first in-depth and comprehensive study of attitudes and behaviors of the United States toward major international courts and tribunals, including the International Courts of Justice, WTO, and NAFTA dispute settlement systems; the Inter–American Court of Human Rights; and all international criminal courts. Thirteen essays by American legal scholars map and analyze current and past patterns of promotion or opposition, use or neglect, of international judicial bodies by various branches of the United States government, suggesting a complex and deeply ambivalent relationship. The United States has been, and continues to be, not only a promoter of the various international courts and tribunals but also an active participant of the judicial system. It appears before some of the international judicial bodies frequently and supports more, both politically and financially. At the same time, it is less engaged than it could be, particularly given its strong rule of law foundations and its historical tradition of commitment to international law and its institutions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Romano, C. P. R. (2009). The sword and the scales: The United States and international courts and tribunals. The Sword and the Scales: The United States and International Courts and Tribunals (pp. 1–460). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819759

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free