Endurance, resistance and resilience in the South African health care system: Case studies to demonstrate mechanisms of coping within a constrained system

15Citations
Citations of this article
148Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: South Africa is at present undertaking a series of reforms to transform public health services to make them more effective and responsive to patient and provider needs. A key focus of these reforms is primary care and its overburdened, somewhat dysfunctional and hierarchical nature. This comparative case study examines how patients and providers respond in this system and cope with its systemic demands through mechanisms of endurance, resistance and resilience, using coping and agency literatures as the theoretical lenses. Methods: As part of a larger research project carried out between 2009 and 2010, this study conducted semi-structured interviews and observations at health facilities in three South African provinces. This study explored patient experiences of access to health care, in particular, ways of coping and how health care providers cope with the health care system's realities. From this interpretive base, four cases (two patients, two providers) were selected as they best informed on endurance, resistance and resilience. Some commentary from other respondents is added to underline the more ubiquitous nature of these coping mechanisms. Results: The cases of four individuals highlight the complexity of different forms of endurance and passivity, emotion- and problem-based coping with health care interactions in an overburdened, under-resourced and, in some instances, poorly managed system. Patients' narratives show the micro-practices they use to cope with their treatment, by not recognizing victimhood and sometimes practising unhealthy behaviours. Providers indicate how they cope in their work situations by using peer support and becoming knowledgeable in providing good service. Conclusions: Resistance and resilience narratives show the adaptive power of individuals in dealing with difficult illness, circumstances or treatment settings. They permit individuals to do more than endure (itself a coping mechanism) their circumstances, though resistance and resilience may be limited. These are individual responses to systemic forces. To transform health care, mutually supportive interactions are required among and between both patients and providers but their nature, as micro-practices, may show a way forward for system change.

References Powered by Scopus

Searching for the Structure of Coping: A Review and Critique of Category Systems for Classifying Ways of Coping

1889Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The case study approach

1489Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Qualitative Research Designs: Selection and Implementation

1375Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Diabetes care among urban women in Soweto, South Africa: A qualitative study

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

'Doing more with Less': A qualitative investigation of perceptions of South African health service managers on implementation of health innovations

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Coping and compromise: A qualitative study of how primary health care providers respond to health reform in China

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eyles, J., Harris, B., Fried, J., Govender, V., & Munyewende, P. (2015). Endurance, resistance and resilience in the South African health care system: Case studies to demonstrate mechanisms of coping within a constrained system. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1112-9

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 63

73%

Researcher 15

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 31

34%

Medicine and Dentistry 24

26%

Social Sciences 23

25%

Psychology 13

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free