Surfactant Protein B Plasma Levels: Reliability as a Biomarker in COPD Patients

11Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of COPD is based on both clinical signs and functional tests. Although there are different functional tests used to assess COPD, no reliable biomarkers able to provide information on pathogenesis and severity are available. The aim of the present study is to explore the relationship between surfactant protein B (Sp-B) serum levels and clinical, radiological, and functional pulmonary parameters in COPD patients. Methods: Forty COPD patients and twenty smokers without airflow limitations or respiratory symptoms were enrolled. Each patient was given questionnaires (CAT and mMRC) and 6MWT, spirometry, DLCO, and computer tomography (CT) were performed. All participants underwent a venous blood sample drawing, and quantitative detection of their Sp-B plasma levels was performed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The spirometry and Sp-B plasma levels were assessed after 12 months. Results: A statistically significant difference was found in the plasma Sp-B levels between COPD patients compared to the other group (4.72 + 3.2 ng/mL vs. 1.78 + 1.5 ng/mL; p < 0.001). The change in FEV1 after 12 months (Delta FEV1) showed a significantly negative correlation with respect to the change in Sp-B levels (Delta SpB) (r = −0.4; p < 0.05). This correlation indicates that increasing the plasma dosage of SpB is a foretoken of functional decline. Conclusions: SpB may be considered as a useful marker in COPD assessment and provides prognostic information on lung functional decline. Despite its usefulness, further studies are needed to define its reliability as a biomarker.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

D’Ascanio, M., Viccaro, F., Pizzirusso, D., Guerrieri, G., Pagliuca, A., Guerrini, S., … Ricci, A. (2023). Surfactant Protein B Plasma Levels: Reliability as a Biomarker in COPD Patients. Biomedicines, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11010124

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free