Marginal Adaptation of Veneers: A Systematic Review

  • Badami V
  • Satya Priya M
  • Krishna L
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study aimed to systematically review the literature to evaluate the marginal adaptation of veneers using different fabrication methods, namely, conventional feldspathic porcelain laminate veneers (PLVs), computer-aided design-computer-aided machining (CAD-CAM) veneers, and pressed veneers. A comprehensive literature search was performed using electronic databases (PubMed and Google Scholar) as well as hand searches to identify all relevant studies related to veneers and marginal adaptation. The identified studies were screened for assessing the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The included articles were then subjected to data extraction and analysis. The search resulted in 130 articles, of which six were included in this systematic review. All included articles were assessed for adaptation of margins. Based on the findings of this systematic review, no significant differences were found in the marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM and conventional feldspathic PLVs. The marginal fidelity of ceramic veneers issuing from the various fabrication techniques was clinically acceptable.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Badami, V., Satya Priya, M., Krishna, L., Kethineni, H., Akarapu, S., & Agarwal, S. (2022). Marginal Adaptation of Veneers: A Systematic Review. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31885

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free