Staff and service user perspectives of a co-located homelessness centre in Scotland: a mixed-methods evaluation

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Co-location and integration of services within a psychologically informed environment (PIE) is recommended for people experiencing homelessness (PEH) but there are few examples of this in the UK. Such a centre opened in Edinburgh, Scotland in November 2021. Aim: To evaluate progress of the new centre. Design & setting: This was a mixed-methods pre–post-test design study before (baseline) and 2 years after (follow-up) the move to the new co-located centre. The study took place in Edinburgh, Scotland. The baseline evaluation was conducted at two separate homelessness services and the follow-up evaluation at the new co-located centre. Method: Baseline and follow-up staff surveys measured knowledge of trauma-informed care (TIC), wellbeing, team climate, and job satisfaction. The follow-up staff survey also evaluated staff support and service improvements. In-depth staff interviews were conducted at baseline (n = 25) and followup and analysed thematically. A service-user survey was also conducted. Results: The staff survey showed significant improvements between baseline and follow-up in TIC, burnout, and team climate, together with improvements in support, service integration, and service-user care. Service users reported high satisfaction with the new centre. Staff interviews identified a more PIE, better staff support, and improved opportunistic multidisciplinary working over the 2 years of the centre opening. However, a number of barriers were also identified relating to the building and the IT systems. Further work on the centre’s vision, short and long-term integration plans, workload, and sustainability were felt to be needed. Conclusion: Co-location of services for PEH in Scotland has led to reductions in staff burnout and improvements in team climate and service users’ satisfaction over the first 2 years of opening. However, barriers remain and full integration requires a clearer vision and ‘roadmap’, requiring collaborative leadership and sustainable funding.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ng, L., Donaghy, E., Conway, J., & Mercer, S. W. (2025). Staff and service user perspectives of a co-located homelessness centre in Scotland: a mixed-methods evaluation. BJGP Open, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0198

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free