Conversations on method: Deconstructing policy through the researcher reflective journal

12Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article the authors argue that the researcher reflective journal is a critical interpretive tool for conducting educational policy analysis. The idea for this research grew from the experiences of a doctoral candidate (Ruth) in pursuit of a policy focused dissertation and a series of on-going conversations with her qualitative methodologist (Valerie). The structure of the paper takes a dialogue form on the topic of policy analysis and the various uses of the journal, including found data poetry and photographic representations of the self as a research instrument, which may expand the findings and increase options for data presentation. Sections of the paper include a discussion on journal writing as a creative process, the reflective role of the researcher when examining policies, and the challenges of constructing a well-designed methodological framework. © 2011: Ruth C. Slotnick, Valerie J. Janesick, and Nova Southeastern University.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Slotnick, R. C., & Janesick, V. J. (2011). Conversations on method: Deconstructing policy through the researcher reflective journal. Qualitative Report, 16(5), 1352–1360. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2011.1302

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free