Determining the optimal outcome measures for studying the social determinants of health

5Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Americans have significantly poorer health outcomes and shorter longevity than citizens of other industrialized nations. Poverty is a major driver of these poor health outcomes in the United States. Innovative anti-poverty policies may help reduce economic malaise thereby increasing the health and longevity of the most vulnerable Americans. However, there is no consensus framework for studying the health impacts of anti-poverty social policies. In this paper, we describe a case study in which leading global experts systematically: (1) developed a conceptual model that outlines the potential pathways through which a social policy influences health, (2) fits outcome measures to this conceptual model, and (3) estimates an optimal time frame for collection of the selected outcome measures. This systematic process, called the Delphi method, has the potential to produce estimates more quickly and with less bias than might be achieved through expert panel discussions alone. Our case study is a multi-component randomized-controlled trial (RCT) of a workforce policy called MyGoals for Healthy Aging.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Muennig, P., McEwen, B., Belsky, D. W., Noble, K. G., Riccio, J., & Manly, J. (2020). Determining the optimal outcome measures for studying the social determinants of health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093028

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free