Paying for International environmental public goods

28Citations
Citations of this article
102Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Supply of international environmental public goods must meet certain conditions to be socially efficient, and several reasons explain why they are currently undersupplied. Diagnosis of the public goods failure associated with particular ecosystem services is critical to the development of the appropriate international response. There are two categories of international environmental public goods that are most likely to be undersupplied. One has an additive supply technology and the other has a weakest link supply technology. The degree to which the collective response should be targeted depends on the importance of supply from any one country. In principle, the solution for the undersupply lies in payments designed to compensate local providers for the additional costs they incur in meeting global demand. Targeted support may take the form of direct investment in supply (the Global Environment Facility model) or of payments for the benefits of supply (the Payments for Ecosystem Services model). © Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arriagada, R., & Perrings, C. (2011). Paying for International environmental public goods. In Ambio (Vol. 40, pp. 798–806). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0156-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free