Clinical trial: Levofloxacin-based quadruple therapy was inferior to traditional quadruple therapy in the treatment of resistant Helicobacter pylori infection

24Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of levofloxacin-based quadruple therapy in resistant Helicobacter pylori infection is not known. Aim: To test the efficacy of levofloxacin-based quadruple therapy and traditional quadruple therapy in resistant H. pylori infection. Methods: One hundred and two patients with resistant H. pylori infection were randomized to 1 week of either EBAL (esomeprazole 40 mg b.d., bismuth subcitrate 240 mg b.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.d. and levofloxacin 500 mg b.d.) or EBMT (esomeprazole 40 mg b.d., bismuth subcitrate 240 mg b.d., metronidazole 400 mg t.d.s. and tetracycline 500 mg q.d.s.). 13C-urea breath test was performed at week 12 to assess post-treatment H. pylori status. Results: In intention-to-treat analysis H. pylori eradication was achieved in 37 of 51 (73%) subjects in EBAL and 45 of 51 (88%) subjects in EBMT groups, respectively (P = 0.046). Per-protocol eradication rates of EBAL and EMBT groups were 78% and 94%, respectively (P = 0.030). The intention-to-treat eradication rate was statistically lower for EBAL than EMBT (56% vs. 90%, P = 0.013) among those who had failed more than one course of eradication therapy. Previous levofloxacin triple therapy did not affect the efficacy of either protocol significantly. Conclusions: Levofloxacin-based quadruple therapy was inferior to traditional quadruple therapy for resistant H. pylori infection. © 2007 The Authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yee, Y. K., Cheung, T. K., Chu, K. M., Chan, C. K., Fung, J., Chan, P., … Wong, B. C. Y. (2007). Clinical trial: Levofloxacin-based quadruple therapy was inferior to traditional quadruple therapy in the treatment of resistant Helicobacter pylori infection. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 26(7), 1063–1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03452.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free