Validation and reliability of the Care Vulnerability Index: A study by interrater agreement and test–retest method

8Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the validity and reliability of the Care Vulnerability Index (CVI) as a tool to estimate the need and competence of care. Design: A cross-sectional survey including a longitudinal component. Methods: Content validity ratio (CVR) was calculated by interrater agreement of a group of 11 experts in two rounds. The test–retest analysis was measured in an urban population of Colombia with 96 participants through two statistical tests: Pearson's correlation coefficient and the difference in means. Results: Care Vulnerability Index turned out to be valid with a CVR of 0.879. Reliability by Pearson correlation between test–retest was 0.912 (CI95: 0.872–0.941; p-value

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fernández Batalla, M., Monsalvo San Macario, E., González Aguña, A., Herrero Jaén, S., Gonzalo de Diego, B., Manrique Anaya, Y., … Santamaría García, J. M. (2022). Validation and reliability of the Care Vulnerability Index: A study by interrater agreement and test–retest method. Nursing Open, 9(3), 1766–1773. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1203

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free