Co-expression of gastric and biliary phenotype in pyloric-gland type adenoma of the gallbladder: Immunohistochemical analysis of mucin profile and CD10

30Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Pyloric-gland type adenoma of the gallbladder is formed by proliferation of glands resembling pyloric glands, morphologically. No previous report has described the cellular phenotype and differentiation of pyloric-gland type adenoma of the gallbladder, using CD10 as a marker of proper biliary phenotype. Immunostainings were performed for mucin markers such as MUC5AC, human gastric mucin (HGM) for gastric foveolar type epithelium, MUC6, M-GGMC-1 for pyloric-gland type and MUC2 for intestinal goblet-cell type, and for CD10 as a proper biliary type marker on 58 pyloric-gland type adenomas of the gallbladder, as well as for p53, Ki-67 and CDX2. The percentage (X) of reactive cells in relation to the total number of tumor cells was estimated semi-quantitatively, and divided into four categories: X=0% (negative), 0% <30%, and X≥30%. CDX2 expression was considered to be positive when the percentage of positively stained cells was ≥10%. Out of the 58 pyloric-gland type adenomas, ≥30% of adenoma cells were positive for MUC5AC in 22 (38%) tumors, HGM in 29 (50%), MUC6 in 58 (100%), M-GGMC-1 in 54 (93%), MUC2 in none (0%), and CD10 in 20 (34%). MUC6 (P<0.001) and M-GGMC-1 (P<0.001) mucins were detected more frequently in pyloricgland type adenomas, and CD10 expression was significantly decreased, compared with normal gallbladder epithelium (P=0.006). P53 overexpression was not found in any of the 58 tumors, including two adenomas with carcinomatous foci.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nagata, S., Ajioka, Y., Nishikura, K., Watanabe, G., Inoue, T., Yamaguchi, K., … Tsuneyoshi, M. (2007). Co-expression of gastric and biliary phenotype in pyloric-gland type adenoma of the gallbladder: Immunohistochemical analysis of mucin profile and CD10. Oncology Reports, 17(4), 721–729. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.17.4.721

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free