TOC estimation of shale oil reservoir by combining nuclear magnetic resonance logging and nuclear physics logging

5Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The evaluation of source rock properties has become a vital step in logging interpretation. Total organic carbon (TOC) content is the key to estimating the quality and hydrocarbon generation potential of source rocks. In the shale oilfield of the Junggar Basin, the conventional method of calculating the TOC of hydrocarbon source rocks cannot satisfy logging evaluation requirements. This paper predominantly deals with a method for the quantitative estimation of TOC in source rocks via nuclear physics and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logs. According to this method, the total hydrogen index of the source rock is the sum of the response of kerogen, clay minerals and fluid, expressed by corrected neutron porosity. The hydrogen index of fluid and clay minerals is indicated by the effective porosity of NMR and the estimated clay content, respectively. To eliminate the hydrogen index of fluid, the effective NMR porosity is subtracted from the corrected neutron porosity. On this basis, a new and overlapping method suitable for clay-rich rocks and oil reservoirs is proposed. This method was developed by overlaying the scaled clay content curve on the hydrogen index curve. In non-source rocks, the two curves regularly overlap. However, in organic-rich rocks the two curves will separate. The separation distance between the two curves was used to estimate TOC continuously. Possessing sound application and benefiting from the measured results of sweet spots, this method provides new insights for TOC quantitative prediction in shale oil reservoirs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Feng, Z., Feng, C., Zhong, Y., Qin, Z., Mao, R., Zhao, L., & Zong, X. (2022). TOC estimation of shale oil reservoir by combining nuclear magnetic resonance logging and nuclear physics logging. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 19(4), 833–845. https://doi.org/10.1093/jge/gxac052

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free