Submillimeter Imaging Polarimetry of the NGC 7538 Region

  • Momose M
  • Tamura M
  • Kameya O
  • et al.
33Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Imaging polarimetry of the 850 μm continuum emission in the NGC 7538 region, obtained with the SCUBA Polarimeter, is presented. The polarization map is interpreted in terms of thermal radiation by magnetically aligned dust grains. Two prominent cores associated with IRS 1 and IRS 11, IRS 1(SMM), and IRS 11(SMM), are found in the surface brightness map. Although these cores look similar in surface brightness, their polarization shows striking differences. In IRS 11(SMM), the polarization vectors are extremely well-ordered, and the degrees of polarization are quite high with an average of ∼3.9%. In IRS 1(SMM), on the other hand, the directions of polarization vectors are locally disturbed, and the degrees of polarization are much lower than those of IRS 11(SMM). These differences suggest that small scale fluctuations of the magnetic field are more prominent in IRS 1(SMM). This can be interpreted in terms of the difference in evolutionary stage of the cores. Inside IRS 1(SMM), which seems to be at a later evolutionary stage than IRS 11(SMM), substructures such as subclumps or a cluster of infrared sources have already formed. Small scale fluctuations in the magnetic field could have developed during the formation of these substructures. The distribution of magnetic field directions derived from our polarization map agrees well with those of molecular outflows associated with IRS 1(SMM) and IRS 11(SMM). Comparisons of energy densities between the magnetic field and the outflows show that the magnetic field probably plays an important role in guiding the directions of the outflows.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Momose, M., Tamura, M., Kameya, O., Greaves, J. S., Chrysostomou, A., Hough, J. H., & Morino, J. ‐I. (2001). Submillimeter Imaging Polarimetry of the NGC 7538 Region. The Astrophysical Journal, 555(2), 855–862. https://doi.org/10.1086/321516

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free