Surgery for cervical cancer: Consensus & controversies

53Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Surgery plays an important role in the management of early-stage cervical cancer. Type III radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection using open route is the standard surgical procedure. There is level I evidence against the use of laparoscopic/robotic approach for radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Emerging data support the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy and nerve sparing radical hysterectomy in carefully selected patients with early-stage disease. In locally advanced cervical cancer patients, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical surgery yields inferior disease-free survival compared to definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Therefore, definitive concurrent chemoradiation is the standard treatment for locally advanced disease. Fertility preserving surgery is feasible in highly selected young patients. Role of less-radical surgical procedures in patients' with low-stage disease with good prognostic factors is under evaluation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poddar, P., & Maheshwari, A. (2021, August 1). Surgery for cervical cancer: Consensus & controversies. Indian Journal of Medical Research. Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_4240_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free