Institutions V. Geography: Sub-National Evidence From the United States

  • Romero-Barrutieta A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Empirical studies of the impact of geography and institutions on growth and development at the international level have become common place, but the high degree of abstraction at that level has led to calls for subnational studies. This paper examines these issues for a region of the United States, Appalachia, where the specific factors at play are identified and measured thus obviating the need for instrumental variable techniques. The evidence suggests that initial conditions, including both geography and institutions, are very important for economic development, having significant effects lasting hundreds of years.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Romero-Barrutieta, A., & Clifton, E. V. (2006). Institutions V. Geography: Sub-National Evidence From the United States. IMF Working Papers, 06(169), 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451864298.001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free