Intermethod reliability and factors affecting recall with the Temple University Community Participation measure

33Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Background: Increased interest in promoting community inclusion of adults with serious mental illnesses will necessitate advances in measuring community participation as an outcome of such efforts.Aims: The primary aim of this study is to examine the intermethod reliability of the Temple University Community Participation (TUCP) measure with a daily checklist approach. Secondary aims are to explore the influence of frequency and importance of participation on recall consistency.Method: One hundred and seven individuals diagnosed with a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, or major depression completed a daily checklist of community participation in 25 areas. Approximately 30 days later they completed the TUCP measure involving recall of participation in these same areas.Results: TUCP responses were highly correlated with totals from the daily checklists. Participation areas with more participation days have higher TUCP-diary checklist correlations. Importance of the participation area did not appear to affect correlations.Conclusions: The TUCP is a usable and relatively unobtrusive measure of community participation. Modest evidence found that more frequent events were recalled more consistently.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Salzer, M. S., Kottsieper, P., & Brusilovskiy, E. (2015). Intermethod reliability and factors affecting recall with the Temple University Community Participation measure. Journal of Mental Health, 24(4), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2015.1036976

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free