Balanced or Unbalanced Development: Special Economic Zones as Catalysts for Transition

92Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We develop a theory for a transition economy under which an unbalanced development strategy that favors special economic zones emerges as a response to two critical problems: (1) political pressure to satisfy certain social expenditure requirements and (2) the lack of institutions to constrain the state from expropriation. By promoting the concentration of resources in some areas, a low equilibrium trap can be avoided, while important spillover effects may be generated elsewhere. The experience of China with special economic zones and coastal open areas is interpreted in this light. Some problems in the Russian economy are also discussed in the context of this theory.J. Comp. Econom.,March 1998, 26(1), pp. 117-141. Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-6072. © 1998 Academic Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Litwack, J. M., & Qian, Y. (1998). Balanced or Unbalanced Development: Special Economic Zones as Catalysts for Transition. Journal of Comparative Economics, 26(1), 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.1997.1502

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free