A comparison of a conventional taxonomy with a 3D visualization for use by children

6Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The paper presents the results of a comparison of two interfaces, one a conventional taxonomy of terms relating to Canadian history, and the other a 3D information visualization of the same terms. Both interfaces were used by volunteer students from grades five and six of an elementary school to locate terms within the taxonomy. The interfaces were evaluated according to whether the task was successfully completed, and if so, how quickly. The students' affective reactions to both interfaces were also collected through a questionnaire. Neither interface performed significantly better than the other in terms of task completion or task time; a majority of students found the conventional interface easier to use but the 3D interface more fun.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beheshti, J., Large, A., Julien, C. A., & Tam, M. (2010). A comparison of a conventional taxonomy with a 3D visualization for use by children. In Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting (Vol. 47). John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504701061

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free