Do Stakeholder Relations Matter for Chaebol Companies? Evidence from Korean Product Market Supply Contracts*∗∗

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the effect of supply contracts signed with Chaebol companies in order to analyse the certification effect of trading relationships with Chaebols on suppli-ers. We find that the suppliers suffering from information asymmetry can sacrifice the direct profits gained from a supply contract with a Chaebol group member contractee while pursuing certification for further growth. The valuation of suppliers with a Chaebol group member as the contractee is lower when the suppliers’ information asymmetry is higher. The results also show that the operational margins of the suppliers deteriorate after obtain-ing a supply contract with a Chaebol group member, whereas the sales increase significantly more than the contract amount. These results imply that the Chaebol groups play a role in the certification of the product market and help quality suppliers achieve greater recogni-tion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kwon, K. M., & Jung, H. (2022). Do Stakeholder Relations Matter for Chaebol Companies? Evidence from Korean Product Market Supply Contracts*∗∗. Korean Journal of Financial Studies, 51(3), 359–381. https://doi.org/10.26845/KJFS.2022.06.51.3.359

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free