Prospect-theory's diminishing sensitivity versus economics' intrinsic utility of money: How the introduction of the Euro can be used to disentangle the two empirically

27Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The introduction of the euro gave a unique opportunity to empirically disentangle two components of utility: intrinsic value, a rational component central in economics, and the numerosity effect (going by numbers while ignoring units), a descriptive and irrational component central in prospect theory and underlying the money illusion. We measured relative risk aversion in Belgium before and after the introduction of the euro, and could consider changes in intrinsic value while keeping numbers constant, and changes in numbers while keeping intrinsic value constant. Intrinsic value significantly affected risk aversion, and the numerosity effect did not. Our study is the first to confirm the classical hypothesis of increasing relative risk aversion while avoiding irrational distortions due to the numerosity effect. © 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wakker, P. P., Köbberling, V., & Schwieren, C. (2007). Prospect-theory’s diminishing sensitivity versus economics’ intrinsic utility of money: How the introduction of the Euro can be used to disentangle the two empirically. Theory and Decision, 63(3), 205–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9040-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free