Abstract
This paper argues that Sulmasy and Sugarman have not succeeded in showing a moral difference between withholding and withdrawing treatment. In particular, they have misunderstood historical entitlement theory, which does not automatically prefer a first occupant by just acquisition.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Harris, J. (1994). Are withholding and withdrawing therapy always morally equivalent? A reply to Sulmasy and Sugarman. Journal of Medical Ethics, 20(4), 223–224. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.20.4.223
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free