Are withholding and withdrawing therapy always morally equivalent? A reply to Sulmasy and Sugarman.

14Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper argues that Sulmasy and Sugarman have not succeeded in showing a moral difference between withholding and withdrawing treatment. In particular, they have misunderstood historical entitlement theory, which does not automatically prefer a first occupant by just acquisition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harris, J. (1994). Are withholding and withdrawing therapy always morally equivalent? A reply to Sulmasy and Sugarman. Journal of Medical Ethics, 20(4), 223–224. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.20.4.223

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free