How well iphones measure steps in free-living conditions: Cross-sectional validation study

45Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Smartphones have great potential for monitoring physical activity. Although a previous laboratory-based study reported that smartphone apps were accurate for tracking step counts, little evidence on their accuracy in free-living conditions currently exists. Objective: We aimed to investigate the accuracy of step counts measured using iPhone in the real world. Methods: We recruited a convenience sample of 54 adults (mean age 31 [SD 10] years) who owned an iPhone and analyzed data collected in 2016 and 2017. Step count was simultaneously measured using a validated pedometer (Kenz Lifecorder) and the iPhone. Participants were asked to carry and use their own iPhones as they typically would while wearing a pedometer on the waist for 7 consecutive days during waking hours. To assess the agreement between the two measurements, we calculated Spearman correlation coefficients and prepared a Bland-Altman plot. Results: The mean step count measured using the iPhone was 9253 (3787) steps per day, significantly lower by 12% (1277/10,530) than that measured using the pedometer, 10,530 (3490) steps per day (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amagasa, S., Kamada, M., Sasai, H., Fukushima, N., Kikuchi, H., Lee, I. M., & Inoue, S. (2019). How well iphones measure steps in free-living conditions: Cross-sectional validation study. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/10418

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free