The Biomechanical Importance of Bone Block Positioning in Glenoid Augmentation: Every Millimeter Matters

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: In the presence of anterior glenoid bone loss (aGBL), options for bony glenoid augmentation include Latarjet procedures and free bone block transfers. Bone graft placement is challenging, and malposition causes complications, such as recurrent instability or osteoarthritis. Hypothesis: With minimal changes in bone block positioning, osteochondral shoulder stability cannot be restored sufficiently. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: In a robotic test setup, 14 human cadaveric scapulae were included. Soft tissue was resected, and matching artificial humeri were selected for each specimen. Testing was performed in 60° of glenohumeral abduction with 50 N of glenohumeral compression and anterior-directed translational force to the humerus. Application of 20% aGBL and screw fixation of artificial bone blocks (artBBs) with different buildup shells allowed the following testing stages: (1) intact, (2) 20% aGBL, (3) flush artBB, (4) 1-mm medialized artBB, and (5) 1-mm lateralized artBB. The stability ratio (SR) and medial-lateral humeral head starting position were assessed. Results: Specimens with 20% aGBL provided lower mean SRs than native joints (20.6% [SD, 4.7%] vs 27.8% [SD, 6.7%]; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oenning, S., Wermers, J., Köhler, A., Sußiek, J., Wiethölter, M., Raschke, M. J., & Katthagen, J. C. (2025). The Biomechanical Importance of Bone Block Positioning in Glenoid Augmentation: Every Millimeter Matters. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 53(5), 1164–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251322796

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free