Abstract
This paper investigates the role of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in academic settings, focusing on its effectiveness in providing feedback during the brainstorming phase of the design process. A controlled study with 25 students (n=25) compared feedback from Generative AI (GPT-4) to that from six human educators. Findings reveal that AI-generated feedback enhances student motivation during ideation and facilitates iterative idea refinement. Generative AI's ability to deliver rapid, scalable feedback proves advantageous in resource-constrained contexts, supporting more effective design processes. This research highlights the potential for AI-driven feedback mechanisms to transform human-AI collaboration in design education, addressing key challenges in personalized and scalable feedback delivery.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Schmitt-Fumian, T. K., Tauscher, S., & Thoring, K. (2025). AI vs. human: Exploring the potential of generative AI as a feedback tool to support ideation in design education. In Proceedings of the Design Society (Vol. 5, pp. 429–438). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2025.10057
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.