Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Reduction Policies: Progress and Promise

98Citations
Citations of this article
136Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Evidence showing the effectiveness of policies to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) is growing. SSBs are one of the largest sources of added sugar in the diet and are linked to multiple adverse health conditions. This review presents a framework illustrating the various types of policies that have been used to reduce SSB exposure and consumption; policies are organized into four categories (financial, information, defaults, and availability) and take into consideration crosscutting policy considerations (feasibility, impact, and equity). Next, for each category, we describe a specific example and provide evidence of impact. Finally, we discuss crosscutting policy considerations, the challenge of choosing among the various policy options, and important areas for future research. Notably, no single policy will reduce SSB consumption to healthy levels, so an integrated policy approach that adapts to changing market and consumption trends; evolving social, political, and public health needs; and emerging science is critical.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krieger, J., Bleich, S. N., Scarmo, S., & Ng, S. W. (2020). Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Reduction Policies: Progress and Promise. In Annual Review of Public Health (Vol. 42, pp. 439–461). Annual Reviews Inc. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-103005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free