Pan-European assessment of coastal flood hazards

Abstract

Coastal flooding is among the most damaging natural hazards in Europe, yet large-scale assessments have typically relied on simplified static “bathtub” models and coarse elevation data. Here, we present a novel pan-European methodology that applies a dynamic flood model at 25 m resolution, forced by location-specific total water level hydrographs. These hydrographs integrate mean sea level, tides, storm surge, and wave setup with spatially varying foreshore slopes, allowing storm type, duration, and shape to be explicitly represented. More than 51 000 coastal target points were used to reconstruct events, and the methodology was validated against 12 local-scale historical floods across diverse coastlines. The validation results confirmed the robustness of the large-scale methodology while highlighting the strong dependence of the results on the resolution and vertical accuracy of the underlying digital elevation model. At continental-scale, sensitivity analyses quantified uncertainty from model selection, hydrograph shape, and storm type. Results show that static flood models systematically overestimate inundation, with errors exceeding 25 % in low-lying coastal floodplains such as Belgium and the United Kingdom. At the continental scale, storm type variability explains 41 % of flood map uncertainty, while hydrograph shape has a smaller but measurable effect. Including coastal protection standards reduces the estimated exposed floodplain by more than half, underscoring the critical role of defenses. By bridging the gap between global static assessments and local dynamic models, this study establishes a methodological benchmark for continental-scale flood hazard mapping.