Outcomes of Sleeve Lobectomy versus Pneumonectomy for Lung Cancer

4Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Sleeve lobectomy for lung cancer in close proximity to or involving the carina is widely accepted. Operative morbidity and mortality rates, recurrence, and survival rates have varied considerably across studies. Materials and Methods: From March of 2005 to July of 2010, sleeve lobectomy was performed in 19 patients and pneumonectomy was performed in 20 patients. In this paper, the results of sleeve lobectomy and pneumonectomy for patients with lung cancer will be compared and evaluated. Results: There were no postoperative complications in either group, but there was one mortality in the pneumonectomy group. There was better preservation of pulmonary function in the sleeve lobectomy group than the pneumonectomy group (p=0.066 in FVC, p=0.019 in FEV1). The 3-year survival rates were 46.7% in the sleeve lobectomy group and 54.5% in the pneumonectomy group (p=0.505). The 3-year disease-free survival rates were 38% in the sleeve lobectomy group and 45.8% in the pneumonectomy group (p=0.200). Conclusion: Sleeve lobectomy for lung cancer showed low mortality, low bronchial anastomotic complication rates, and good preservation of pulmonary function. © The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2011.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, H. K., Lee, H. S., Kim, K. I., Shin, H. S., Lee, J. W., Kim, H. S., & Cho, S. W. (2011). Outcomes of Sleeve Lobectomy versus Pneumonectomy for Lung Cancer. Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 44(6), 413–417. https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2011.44.6.413

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free