Abstract
This pooled analysis includes 2 phase 3, double-blind trials designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tigecycline, versus that of imipenem-cilastatin, in 1642 adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections. Patients were randomized to receive either tigecycline (initial dose of 100 mg, followed by 50 mg intravenously every 12 h) or imipenem-cilastatin (500/500 mg intravenously every 6 h) for 5-14 days. The primary end point was the clinical response at the test-of-cure visit (12-42 days after therapy) in the co-primary end point microbiologically evaluable and microbiological modified intent-to-treat populations. For the microbiologically evaluable group, clinical cure rates were 86.1% (441/512) for tigecycline, versus 86.2% (442/513) for imipenemcilastatin (95% confidence interval for the difference, -4.5% to 4.4%; P
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Babinchak, T., Ellis-Grosse, E., Dartois, N., Rose, G. M., & Loh, E. (2005). The efficacy and safety of tigecycline for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: Analysis of pooled clinical trial data. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 41(5 SUPPL.). https://doi.org/10.1086/431676
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.