Measurement of early wear rates with X3 polyethylene and 36-mm femoral heads in young patients - A prospective study

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Development of highly cross-linked polyethylene has allowed the use of larger femoral heads. We studied the wear rates of X3 polyethylene with 36-mm heads in younger patients to determine whether there was an increase in overall wear with these larger heads. Methods: This was a prospective study of 100 consecutive total hip arthroplasties. All received 36-mm heads with X3 polyethylene articulation. Follow-up averaged 2.3 (range, 1.99-2.87) years. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score and High Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. Femoral head penetration was measured at 2 months, 1 year, 18 months, and 2 years using a validated edge-detecting software program by a blinded independent observer. Results: All patients had significant improvement in their functional scores (WOMAC and HAAS, P<0.001). Steady state twodimensional wear rate was -0.05 mm/year. There were no significant differences in two-dimensional, three-dimensional, or volumetric wear when compared with age, polyethylene thickness, or the acetabular position. Conclusions: This study showed extremely low steady state wear rates in X3, highly cross-linked polyethylene when used together with36-mm ceramic femoral heads for total hip arthroplasty at 2 years. At this early stage, these results offer reassurance to surgeons wishing to use larger femoral heads with X-3 polyethylene particularly in younger men. © 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Selvarajah, E., Hooper, G. J., Woodfield, T. B. F., Inglis, G., & Frampton, C. (2013). Measurement of early wear rates with X3 polyethylene and 36-mm femoral heads in young patients - A prospective study. Current Orthopaedic Practice, 24(6), 641–646. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0b013e31829cc4c9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free