Comparison of Procalcitonin Versus C Reactive Protein in The Detection of Neonatal Sepsis

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To compare procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in the detection of neonatal sepsis keeping blood culture as gold standard. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Children Hospital, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, from Jul to Dec 2018. Methodology: Neonates up to 28 days of age with the suspicion of sepsis were selected. All the patients with congenital malformation were excluded. Two bed-sided tests i.e., procalcitonin and C-reactive protein was performed using standardized laboratory methods. The diagnostic strength of both tests was compared. Results: A total of 154 neonates were enrolled in this study. Male neonates were dominant in this study 95 (61.7%). The mean age of patients was 6.1 ± 3.8 days. C reactive protein had a sensitivity and specificity of 50.9% and 28.7% respectively. While procalcitonin was found to have a comparatively high sensitivity and specificity 73.6% and 38.6% respectively. On blood culture test; klebsiella pneumoniae, pseudomonas, staphylococcus aureus were found out to be the most common pathogens. Conclusion: Procalcitonin has a better sensitivity and specificity than C reactive protein in the diagnosis of early neonatal sepsis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ali, W., Shirazi, H., Gul, S., Halim, A., Ain, Q. U., & Zaman, Q. (2022). Comparison of Procalcitonin Versus C Reactive Protein in The Detection of Neonatal Sepsis. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 72(1), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v72i1.2478

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free