Myeloproliferative neoplasms: Morphology and clinical practice

39Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), controversy persists regarding the usefulness and reproducibility of bone marrow (BM) features. Disagreements concerning the WHO classification are mainly focused on the discrimination between essential thrombocythemia (ET) and prefibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis (prePMF) and prodromal polycythemia vera (PV). Criticism mostly refers to lack of standardization of distinctive BM features precluding correct morphological pattern recognition. The distinction between WHO-defined ET and prePMF is not trivial because outcome is significantly worse in prePMF. Morphology was generally considered to be non-specific for the diagnosis of PV. Recent studies have revealed under-diagnosis of morphologically and biologically consistent PV. Am. J. Hematol. 91:430-433, 2016.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barbui, T., Thiele, J., Vannucchi, A. M., & Tefferi, A. (2016). Myeloproliferative neoplasms: Morphology and clinical practice. American Journal of Hematology, 91(4), 430–433. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.24288

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free