105 Burn Injury Severity: Proposed Definitions Based on the National Burn Research Dataset

Abstract

DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irae186 Journal of Burn Care & Research, Volume. XX, Issue. XX, 25 September 2024 Previous iterations of burn severity (mild, moderate, and severe) were not data-driven and were outdated. Clustering analyses have gained popularity for identifying homogenous subgroups from heterogeneous medical conditions, such as asthma, sepsis, and lung disease. There is no consensus in burn literature regarding what constitutes massive burns. The current classification includes a 20% total body surface area (TBSA) burn and a 95% TBSA burn as severe. Latent class and hierarchical clustering analyses were applied to the American Burn Association National Burn Research Dataset. Cluster variables included length of stay, length of stay, intensive care unit length of, number and type of procedures, and number and type of complications. Nonclustering variables were evaluated after clustering, including burned TBSA, inhalation injury, mortality, discharge disposition, age, sex, and race. Latent class analysis suggested 3 clusters. Hierarchical clustering analysis was applied to the most severe latent class, creating 4 total burn severity groups. In total, 112 297 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean TBSA burned for each class is 4.26 ± 4.91 for minor, 8.07 ± 8.39 for moderate, 22.76 ± 17.31 for severe and 36.72 ± 21.61 for massive. The age and sex proportions were similar among all clusters. The clustering variables steadily increased for each severity cluster. Mortality was the highest in the massive cluster (18.2%). Data-informed categories of burn severity were formed using clustering analyses, which will be helpful for triage, data benchmarking, and class-specific research.