Pacing for neurally mediated syncope: Is placebo powerless?

15Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: After two recent controlled trials failed to prove superiority of cardiac pacing over placebo in patients affected by neurally mediated syncope, a widely accepted opinion is that cardiac pacing therapy is not very effective and that a strong placebo effect exists. Aim To measure the effect of placebo pacing therapy. Method and results: We compared the recurrence rate of syncope during placebo vs. no treatment in controlled trials of drug or pacing therapy. Syncope recurred in 38% of 252 patients randomized to placebo pooled from five trials vs. 34% of 881 patients randomized to no treatment pooled from eight trials. The corresponding recurrence rate with active cardiac pacing was 15% in 203 patients from six trials. Conclusions: Placebo is not an effective therapy for neurally mediated syncope. Different selection criteria in patients who are candidates for cardiac pacing - for example, presence, absence, or severity of the cardioinhibitory reflex may separate positive from negative trials. © 2007 Oxford University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brignole, M., & Sutton, R. (2007). Pacing for neurally mediated syncope: Is placebo powerless? Europace, 9(1), 31–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eul169

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free