Insights into the hepatocellular carcinoma patient journey: Results of the first global quality of life survey

28Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: To better understand the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patient journey, we conducted a patient survey across 13 countries. Methods: The survey included closed- and open-ended questions developed using an iterative process to gather information on demographics, diagnosis and treatment. Patients self-selected or were directed to the online survey by their doctor. Results: A total of 256 patients completed the survey. More than two-thirds (68%) felt they did not receive enough information about HCC at diagnosis. Treatments included oral anticancer therapy, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT). A total of 81% receiving sorafenib, 45% receiving SIRT and 32% receiving TACE reported impaired quality-of-life (QoL). A total of 42, 19 and 0% of patients using sorafenib rated their current QoL as 'poor', 'good' and 'excellent', respectively; compared with SIRT (22, 33 and 6%) or TACE (11, 37 and 13%). Conclusion: Most patients with HCC require additional accessible information. People with incurable HCC require treatments that preserve QoL.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gill, J., Baiceanu, A., Clark, P. J., Langford, A., Latiff, J., Yang, P. M., … Kanavos, P. (2018). Insights into the hepatocellular carcinoma patient journey: Results of the first global quality of life survey. Future Oncology, 14(17), 1701–1710. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2017-0715

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free