A Prognostic Score To Predict Atrial fibrillation Recurrence After External Electrical Cardioversion - SLAC Score

7Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after a successful external electrical cardioversion (ECV) is common. Assessing an individual's risk of AF recurrence is a critical part of the treatment plan. We aimed to develop a prognostic prediction score to predict AF recurrence in AF patients who underwent successful ECV. Methods: A retrospective cohort study that included AF patients who underwent successful ECV was conducted with a primary outcome of AF recurrence at 6 months. Logistic regression analysis was done to identify variables, and a prognostic prediction score was created and internally validated. Results: Four prognostic predictors were identified, including the type of AF, persistent AF (1 point) and long-standing persistent AF (4 points), previous cardioversion (1 point), stroke/transient ischemic attack (3 points), and left atrial volume index ≥40 mL/m2 (6 points). The total score of 14 was further divided into 3 risk groups; low-risk (0-2 points), moderate-risk (3-7 points), and high-risk (8-14 points). The positive likelihood ratio for a moderate-risk patient was 2.08 (95% CI, 1.64-2.63) and for a high-risk patient was 7.90 (95% CI, 2.48-25.17). The score showed good discrimination power with the c-statistic of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.69-0.79). Conclusions: A simple prognostic prediction score for AF recurrence after successful ECV was created with a promising internally validated discrimination power. An external assessment of its usefulness as a tool to identify patients with low, moderate, and high risk for AF recurrence is warranted.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thangjui, S., Yodsuwan, R., Thyagaturu, H., Navaravong, L., & Zoltick, J. (2022). A Prognostic Score To Predict Atrial fibrillation Recurrence After External Electrical Cardioversion - SLAC Score. Critical Pathways in Cardiology, 21(4), 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000295

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free