Macrocycles in Drug Discovery─Learning from the Past for the Future

262Citations
Citations of this article
339Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We have analyzed FDA-approved macrocyclic drugs, clinical candidates, and the recent literature to understand how macrocycles are used in drug discovery. Current drugs are mainly used in infectious disease and oncology, while oncology is the major indication for the clinical candidates and in the literature Most macrocyclic drugs bind to targets that have difficult to drug binding sites. Natural products have provided 80-90% of the drugs and clinical candidates, whereas macrocycles in ChEMBL have less complex structures. Macrocycles usually reside in the beyond the Rule of 5 chemical space, but 30-40% of the drugs and clinical candidates are orally bioavailable. Simple bi-descriptor models, i.e., HBD ≤ 7 in combination with either MW < 1000 Da or cLogP > 2.5, distinguished orals from parenterals and can be used as filters in design. We propose that recent breakthroughs in conformational analysis and inspiration from natural products will further improve the de novo design of macrocycles.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garcia Jimenez, D., Poongavanam, V., & Kihlberg, J. (2023). Macrocycles in Drug Discovery─Learning from the Past for the Future. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 66(8), 5377–5396. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c00134

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free