Dependent on one but vulnerable to another: Opportunism threats and control solutions for customization providers

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

While economic theory suggests that identifying alternate customers is costlier than identifying alternate specialized employees for customization providers, substantial field research evidence indicates the opposite, where providers are reportedly more dependent on employees than customers. We inquire into this contrasting picture between theory and practice through an in-depth case study that suggests that what begins as customer dependence transforms into vulnerability to employees. While perceived vulnerability to customers is efficiently removed through ex ante controls, the physical asset specificity in each customer order generates task uncertainty, specialization and teamwork, which become the new sources of opportunism threat for the customization providers. Compounded layers of ex ante and ex post controls with frequent iterations suggest a need for continuous management (as against removal) of vulnerability to employees. © 2012 AFAANZ.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sridharan, V., & Phang, M. M. S. (2014). Dependent on one but vulnerable to another: Opportunism threats and control solutions for customization providers. Accounting and Finance, 54(2), 591–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2012.00510.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free