Phakic intraocular lenses outcomes and complications: Artisan vs Visian ICL

33Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and visual outcomes of two phakic intraocular lenses (IOLs) for correction of high myopia: Artisan and Visian ICL (ICL). Patients and methods: In this retrospective study, a phakic IOL was implanted in 68 highly myopic eyes of 34 patients; 42 eyes received an Artisan IOL, and 26 eyes received ICL IOL. Results: All patients completed a 1-year follow-up. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SEQ) was -12.89±3.78, and -12.44±4.15 diopters (D) for Artisan and ICL (P=0.078), respectively. The mean postoperative (1-year) uncorrected distance visual acuity was 0.39±0.13 and 0.41±0.15 logMAR for Artisan and ICL, respectively (P=0.268). The mean postoperative (1-year) corrected distance visual acuity was 0.36±0.12 and 0.31±0.12 logMAR for Artisan and ICL, respectively (P=0.128). The mean postoperative SEQ was -0.86±0.5 and -0.63±0.38 D for Artisan and ICL, respectively (P=0.67). Intraocular pressure change at 1 year was 0.64±2.7 and 1.88±0.6 mm Hg for Artisan and ICL, respectively (P=0.77). Conclusion: Artisan and ICL showed equal and comparable safety, predictability, and efficacy. © 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hassaballa, M. A., & Macky, T. A. (2011). Phakic intraocular lenses outcomes and complications: Artisan vs Visian ICL. Eye, 25(10), 1365–1370. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2011.187

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free