Molecular epidemiology of gram-negative bacteremia

16Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We did pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and antibiotic susceptibility testing on 202 gram-negative isolates obtained from blood cultures between 1 January 1989 and 31 December 1993. Seventy-eight patients had at least two gram-negative isolates of the same species recovered from blood drawn one or more days apart and met the other study criteria. Twenty patients had only 1 bloodstream infection, 48 patients had 1 recurrence of bacteremia, and 10 patients had > 1 recurrence of bacteremia. Of 80 recurrences of bacteremia, 52 (65%) were relapses and 28 (35%) were reinfections. Seventy-eight percent of the episodes of bacteremia occurring ≤300 days apart were relapses, and 100% occurring >300 days apart were reinfections (P < .001). Organisms causing recurrent bacteremia were not more resistant than those causing initial episodes. In conclusion, most episodes of recurrent gram-negative bacteremia were relapses. Relapses and reinfections could not be distinguished only by the length of time between episodes or by antimicrobial susceptibility patterns.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wendt, C., Messer, S. A., Hollis, R. J., Pfaller, M. A., Wenzel, R. P., & Herwaldt, L. A. (1999). Molecular epidemiology of gram-negative bacteremia. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 28(3), 605–610. https://doi.org/10.1086/515151

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free