Neuroética y deporte, ¿ Una difícil relación?

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This work shall analyze whether or not the recent studies on neuroethics and neighbour disciplines have a critical impact on the ethical reflection on sports. Given Jonathan Haidt's and Joshua Greene's works on neuroethics, our moral behaviour seems to be mainly rooted in emotive mechanisms within our brain. If this is true, then sports supporters' behaviour can easily be explained by appealing to such emotive brain mechanisms. However, they will turn the efforts to apply the moral principle that is supposed to regulate the sporting world-the fair play principle-into useless efforts. I shall give two counter-arguments that will show, firstly, that supporters' misbehaviour cannot be totally explained by pointing out to several neural-natural-mechanisms, and, secondly, that our brains' make-up can, nevertheless, make sports supporters more willing to abide by the fair play principle. Therefore, sport ethics' aims are not undermined by neuroscientific knowledge.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Frías, F. J. L. (2013). Neuroética y deporte, ¿ Una difícil relación? Contrastes, 18(1–2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.24310/contrastescontrastes.v18i1.1221

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free