Abstract
Scintillometers are becoming increasingly popular for the validation of satellite remote sensing sensible heat-flux estimates due to the comparable spatial resolutions. However, it is important to gain confidence itwo instruments despite their differences in footprint sizes. The differences between the sensible heat-flux measured by both LAS and EC systems fall within the differences between two EC systems. We concludn the accuracy of the sensible heat-flux measurements obtained by the scintillometer. Large aperture scintillometer (LAS) and eddy-covariance (EC) measurements were collected over a homogeneous, dry and semi-arid region near Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA, where the homogeneity allowed direct comparison of the e that the large aperture scintillometer is a reliable system for measuring sensible heat flux in a dry semiarid region. © 2009 The Author(s).
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Zeweldi, D. A., Gebremichael, M., Wang, J., Sammis, T., Kleissl, J., & Miller, D. (2010). Intercomparison of sensible heat flux from large aperture scintillometer and eddy covariance methods: Field experiment over a homogeneous semi-arid region. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 135(1), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-009-9460-9
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.