Gleason grading controversies: What the Chemoprevention trials have taught us

6Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The recent Prostate Chemoprevention Trial (PCPT), which assessed the efficacy of finasteride in reducing prostate cancer incidence, showed promising results. However, patients who developed cancer had higher Gleason scores than those on placebo. Moreover, recent evidence has shown that the biopsy Gleason scores in patients on finasteride were actually more accurate compared with patients on placebo when matched with the final, radical prostatectomy (RP) scores. This accuracy was due to a reduction in prostate volume induced by the drug, and better performance of prostate-specific antigen correlation for identifying men with high-grade cancer. Re-evaluation of the results based on the pathology of the RP specimens and longer follow-up showed a 30% reduction in cancer incidence with finasteride and no significant differences in Gleason scores compared with placebo © 2009 Canadian Urological Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Klotz, L., Drachenberg, D., Fradet, Y., Saad, F., Trachtenberg, J., & Zlotta, A. (2009). Gleason grading controversies: What the Chemoprevention trials have taught us. Journal of the Canadian Urological Association. Canadian Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.1115

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free