Differences of bleedings after percutaneous coronary intervention using femoral closure and radial compression devices

6Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Bleedings represent most relevant complications being correlated with significant rates of adverse clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). To reduce bleeding and improve prognosis various types of vascular closure devices (VCD) are frequently applied. This study aims to compare directly one specific femoral closure (FC) to one specific radial compression (RC) device in patients after PCI focusing on overall and access-site bleedings as well as major adverse cardiac events (MACE). This single-center, prospective, and observational study included consecutive patients either treated by the FC (StarClose SE) or RC (TR Band) device following PCI. The primary outcome was bleeding; the secondary outcomes were MACE at 30days of followup. Two hundred patients in each group were enrolled following PCI. Access-site bleeding was significantly higher in the FC (43%) compared to the RC (30%) group (P=.001). Most common type of access-site bleeding consisted of hematomas. Of these, small and large hematomas were significantly higher in the FC group (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, S. H., Behnes, M., Baron, S., Shchetynska-Marinova, T., Tekinsoy, M., Mashayekhi, K., … Akin, I. (2019). Differences of bleedings after percutaneous coronary intervention using femoral closure and radial compression devices. Medicine (United States), 98(20). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015501

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free