Interdisciplinary groups perform better than intradisciplinary groups in online group discussion activities

8Citations
Citations of this article
154Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Online classes have been provided for health-care pre-licensure learners during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of online group work in interprofessional education. A total of 209 students were assigned to 50 groups (18 medical student groups, 13 nursing student groups, and 19 mixed medical/nursing student groups). Learners performed group work during the orientation for the course, which was hosted using an online video conferencing system. The learners first performed the activity individually (10 min) and then engaged in a group discussion to reach consensus on their answers (30 min). We calculated the scores before and after the group discussion and shared the results with the students. Scores were improved after the group discussion (mean ± SEM, 23.7 ± 0.9) compared with before (37.3 ± 1.3) (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yamashita, T., Osawa, S., Ota, K., Minami, T., Morisaki, Y., Takahashi, Y., … Okamoto, R. (2021). Interdisciplinary groups perform better than intradisciplinary groups in online group discussion activities. Medical Education Online, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1886649

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free