Efficacy and safety of alfentanil plus propofol versus propofol only in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy: A meta-analysis

14Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of alfentanil plus propofol versus propofol only for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, China Biology Medicine, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials on alfentanil combined with propofol versus propofol only for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy from the inception of the database to August 2022. The Rev Man 5.4 software was used for statistical analyses. Results: Thirteen randomized controlled trials involving 1762 patients were identified as eligible for this study. The meta-analysis showed that compared with propofol, alfentanil combined with propofol had a more stable mean arterial pressure [mean difference (MD) = 5.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.97-8.80; P =.002], heart rate (MD = 3.78, 95% CI: 1.30-6.26; P =.003) and pulse oxygen saturation (MD = 1.90, 95% CI: 0.93-2.78; P =.0001); a lower propofol dose (standard mean difference = -2.82, 95% CI: -3.70 to -1.94; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, H., Shi, X., Li, J., & Yang, L. (2023). Efficacy and safety of alfentanil plus propofol versus propofol only in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy: A meta-analysis. Medicine (United States), 102(32), E34745. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034745

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free