The Returns to Education: A Meta-Study

3Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There have been many studies estimating the causal effect of an additional year of education on earnings. The majority employ administrative changes in the minimum school-leaving age as the mechanism allowing identification. Here, we survey 79 such estimates. However, remarkably, while the majority of these studies find substantial gains from education, a number of well-grounded studies find no effect. The average return from these studies still implies substantial average gains from an extra year of education: an average of 8.2%. But the pattern of reported returns shows clear evidence of publication biases: omission of studies where the return was not statistically significantly above 0, and where the estimated return was negative. Correcting for these omitted studies, the implied average causal returns to an extra year of schooling will be only in the range 0%–3%.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clark, G., & Nielsen, C. A. A. (2026). The Returns to Education: A Meta-Study. Kyklos. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.70041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free